<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Nicolae Sfetcu</title>
  <subtitle>My virtual house and friends</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sfetcu.com/content/Interpersonal-relationships"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.sfetcu.com/node/359/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.sfetcu.com/node/359/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-06-09T10:38:33-06:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Interpersonal relationships</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sfetcu.com/content/Interpersonal-relationships" />
    <id>http://www.sfetcu.com/content/Interpersonal-relationships</id>
    <published>2008-06-09T10:38:33-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-09T10:38:33-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>nicolae</name>
    </author>
    <category term="affiliations" />
    <category term="avoidance strategies" />
    <category term="connections" />
    <category term="contact" />
    <category term="feelers" />
    <category term="Guides" />
    <category term="intensifying strategies" />
    <category term="interactional cues" />
    <category term="interpersonal relationships" />
    <category term="intimac" />
    <category term="invitational" />
    <category term="involvement" />
    <category term="people" />
    <category term="perceptual" />
    <category term="public" />
    <category term="Relationships" />
    <category term="social associations" />
    <category term="stages" />
    <category term="uncertainty reduction" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><b>Interpersonal relationships</b> are social associations, connections, or  affiliations between two or more people. They vary in differing levels of  intimacy and sharing, implying the discovery or establishment of common ground,  and may be centered around something(s) shared in common. The study of  relationships is of concern to sociology, psychology and anthropology.</p>
<h2>Stages of Relationship Formation</h2>
<p>1) <b>Contact</b>:</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><b>Interpersonal relationships</b> are social associations, connections, or  affiliations between two or more people. They vary in differing levels of  intimacy and sharing, implying the discovery or establishment of common ground,  and may be centered around something(s) shared in common. The study of  relationships is of concern to sociology, psychology and anthropology.</p>
<h2>Stages of Relationship Formation</h2>
<p>1) <b>Contact</b>:</p>
<dl>
<dd>a) <b>Uncertainty reduction</b> - through eye contact, identification,  	opening disclosure, etc. </dd>
<dd>b) <b>Perceptual</b> - notice how a person looks at the other and their  	body language. </dd>
<dd>c) <b>Interactional cues</b> - nodding, maintaining eye contact, etc.  	</dd>
<dd>d) <b>Invitational</b> - encouraging the relationship (ex. asking if  	they want to meet up later for coffee) </dd>
<dd>e) <b>Avoidance strategies</b> - if one person discloses and the other  	does not, minimal response, lack of eye contact, etc. </dd>
</dl>
<p>2) <b>Involvement</b></p>
<dl>
<dd>a) <b>Feelers</b> - hints or questions (ex. asking about family) </dd>
<dd>b) <b>Intensifying strategies</b> - further the relationship (ex.  	meeting old friend, bringing the other to meet family, becoming more  	affectionate, etc.) </dd>
<dd>c) <b>Public</b> - seen in public together often (ex. if in a romantic  	relationship, may be holding hands) </dd>
</dl>
<p>3) <b>Intimacy</b> -very close, may have exchanged some sort of personal  belonging or something that represents further commitment. (ex. may be a promise  ring in a romantic relationship or a friendship necklace symbolizing two people  are best friends)</p>
<p>4) <b>Deterioration</b> - things start to fall apart. In a romantic  relationship, after six months people are out of the &quot;honeymoon stage&quot; and start  to notice flaws. The way this is dealt with determines the fate of the  relationship.</p>
<h2>Types of interpersonal relationships</h2>
<ul lastcheckbox="null">
<li>Kinship relationships, including family relationships, being related to  	someone else by blood (consanguinity), e.g. fatherhood, motherhood; or  	through marriage (affinity), e.g. father-in-law, mother-in-law, uncle by  	marriage, aunt by marriage.</li>
<li>Formalized intimate relationships or long term relationships through law  	and public ceremony, e.g. marriage and civil union.</li>
<li>Non-formalized intimate relationships or long term relationships such as  	loving relationships or romantic relationships with or without living  	together; the other person is often called lover, boyfriend or girlfriend  	(not to be confused with just a male or female friend), or significant  	other. If the partners live together, the relationship may be similar to  	marriage, and the other person may be called husband or wife. Over a certain  	length of time they are so regarded by common law. Mistress is a somewhat  	old fashioned term for a female lover of a man who is married to another  	woman, or of an unmarried man. She may even be an official mistress (in  	French ma&icirc;tresse en titre); an example is Madame de Pompadour.</li>
<li>Soulmates, individuals who are intimately drawn to one another through a  	favorable meeting of the minds and who find mutual acceptance and  	understanding with one another. Soulmates may feel themselves bonded  	together for a lifetime; and, hence, they may be sexual partners but not  	necessarily.</li>
<li>Casual relationships, relationships extending beyond <i>one night stands</i>  	that exclusively consist of sexual behavior, the participants of which may  	be known as <i>friends with benefits</i> when limited to considering sexual  	intercourse or sexual partners in a wider sense.</li>
<li>Platonic love is an affectionate relationship into which the sexual  	element does not enter, especially in cases where one might easily assume  	otherwise.</li>
<li>Friendship, which consists of mutual love, trust, respect, and  	unconditional acceptance, and usually implies the discovery or establishment  	of common ground between the individuals involved;</li>
<li>Brotherhood and sisterhood, individuals united in a common cause or  	having a common interest, which may involve formal membership in a club,  	organization, association, society, lodge, sorority, fraternity. This type  	of interpersonal relationship also includes the comradeship of fellow  	soldiers in peace or war.</li>
<li>Partners or coworkers in a profession, business, or a common workplace.</li>
<li>Association, simply being introduced to someone or knowing who they are  	by interaction.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Factors affecting interpersonal relationships</h2>
<p>The discovery or establishment of common ground between individuals is a  fundamental component for enduring interpersonal relationships. Loss of common  ground, which may happen over time, may tend to end interpersonal relationships.</p>
<p>For each relationship type, essential skills are needed, and without these  skills more advanced relationships are not possible. Systemic coaching advocates  a hierarchy of relationships, from friendship to global order. Expertise in each  relationship type (in this hierarchy) requires the skills of all previous  relationship types. (For example <i>partnership</i> requires <i>friendship</i>  and <i>teamwork</i> skills).</p>
<p>Interpersonal relationships through consanguinity and affinity can persist  despite the absence of love, affection, or common ground. When these  relationships are in prohibited degrees, sexual intimacy in them would be the  taboo of incest.</p>
<p>Marriage and civil union are relationships reinforced and regularized by  their legal sanction to be &quot;respectable&quot; building blocks of society. In the  United States the de-criminalization of homosexual sexual relations in the  landmark Supreme Court decision, Lawrence v. Texas (2003) facilitated the  &quot;mainstreaming&quot; of gay long term relationships, and broached the possibility of  the legalization of same-sex marriages in that country.</p>
<p>In intimate relationships there is often, but not always, an implicit or  explicit agreement that the partners will not have sex with someone else -  monogamy. The extent to which physical intimacy with other people is accepted  may vary. For example, a husband may be more receptive to his wife being  physically affectionate with her female friend if she has one than with her male  friend.</p>
<p>In friendship there is some transitivity: one may become a friend of an  existing friend's friend. However, if two people have a sexual relationship with  the same person, they may be competitors rather than friends. Accordingly,  sexual behavior with the sexual partner of a friend may damage the friendship.</p>
<p>Sexual relations between two friends may alter that relationship by either  &quot;taking it to the next level&quot; or severing it. Sexual partners may also be  friends: the sexual relationship may either enhance or depreciate the  friendship.</p>
<p>The rise of popular psychology has led to an explosion of concern about one's  interpersonal relationships (often simply called: &quot;relationships&quot;). Intimate  relationships receive particular attention in this context, but Sociology  recognises many other interpersonal links of greater or less duration and/or  significance.</p>
<p>Relationships are not necessarily healthy. Unhealthy examples include abusive  relationships and codependence.</p>
<p>Sociologists recognize a hierarchy of forms of activity and interpersonal  relations, which divides them into: behavior, action, social behavior, social  action, social contact, social interaction and finally social relation.</p>
<h2>Theories of interpersonal relationships</h2>
<ul>
<li>Social psychology has several approaches to the subject of interpersonal  	relationships, among them closure and also trust, as trust between parties  	can be mutual. This may lead to enduring relationships.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Social exchange theory interprets relationships in terms of exchanged  	benefits. The way people feel about relationships will be influenced by the  	rewards of the relationship, as well as rewards they may potentially receive  	in alternate relationships.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Systemic coaching analyzes relationships as expressions of our human  	need to love and be loved. Relationships can be confused by transferences,  	entanglements and substitution. Systemic coaching offers solutions for many  	relationship difficulties.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Equity theory is based on criticism of social exchange theory.  	Proponents argue that people care more than just maximizing rewards, they  	also want fairness and equity in their relationships.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Relational dialectics is based on the idea that a relationship is not a  	static entity. Instead, a relationship is a continuing process, always  	changing. There is constant tension as three main issues are negotiated:  	autonomy vs. connection, novelty vs. predictability, and openness vs.  	closedness.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Attachment styles are a completely different way of analyzing  	relationships. Proponents of this view argue that attachment styles  	developed in childhood continue to be influential throughout adulthood,  	influencing the roles people take on in relationships.</li>
</ul>
<h2>External links</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1396917,00.html" title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1396917,00.html" class="external text"> 	What are friends for?</a> - three part article in UK Guardian newspaper</li>
</ul>
<p>This guide is licensed under the <a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html">GNU Free Documentation License</a>.  It uses material from the <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
