<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Nicolae Sfetcu</title>
  <subtitle>My virtual house and friends</subtitle>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sfetcu.com/content/Spamming-different-media"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.sfetcu.com/node/1722/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.sfetcu.com/node/1722/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-08T03:10:33-06:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Spamming in different media</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sfetcu.com/content/Spamming-different-media" />
    <id>http://www.sfetcu.com/content/Spamming-different-media</id>
    <published>2008-08-07T15:10:54-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-08T03:10:33-06:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>nicolae</name>
    </author>
    <category term="blam" />
    <category term="blog" />
    <category term="chatrooms" />
    <category term="e-mail" />
    <category term="forum" />
    <category term="guestbook" />
    <category term="Guides" />
    <category term="Internet marketing &amp; advertising" />
    <category term="Internet telephony" />
    <category term="Marketing and advertising" />
    <category term="media" />
    <category term="messaging" />
    <category term="mobile phone" />
    <category term="newsgroup" />
    <category term="online game" />
    <category term="referrer" />
    <category term="rel=" />
    <category term="search engines" />
    <category term="spam" />
    <category term="spamdexing" />
    <category term="spamminess" />
    <category term="spamming" />
    <category term="spim" />
    <category term="weblogs" />
    <category term="wiki" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.sfetcu.com/sites/default/files/images/Starfish.preview.jpg" alt="Social Media" title="Social Media" class="image image-preview" width="468" height="428" longdesc="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dbarefoot/1814873464/" /></p>
<h3>E-mail spam</h3>
<p>E-mail spam is by far the most common form of spamming on the internet. It  involves sending identical or nearly identical unsolicited messages to a large  number of recipients. Unlike legitimate commercial e-mail, spam is generally  sent without the explicit permission of the recipients, and frequently contains  various tricks to bypass e-mail filters. Modern computers generally come with  some ability to send spam. The only necessary added ingredient is the list of  addresses to target.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.sfetcu.com/sites/default/files/images/Starfish.preview.jpg" alt="Social Media" title="Social Media" class="image image-preview" width="468" height="428" longdesc="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dbarefoot/1814873464/" /></p>
<h3>E-mail spam</h3>
<p>E-mail spam is by far the most common form of spamming on the internet. It  involves sending identical or nearly identical unsolicited messages to a large  number of recipients. Unlike legitimate commercial e-mail, spam is generally  sent without the explicit permission of the recipients, and frequently contains  various tricks to bypass e-mail filters. Modern computers generally come with  some ability to send spam. The only necessary added ingredient is the list of  addresses to target.</p>
<p>Spammers obtain e-mail addresses by a number of means: <i>harvesting</i>  addresses from Usenet postings, DNS listings, or Web pages; guessing common  names at known domains (known as a <i>dictionary attack</i>); and <i>&quot;e-pending&quot;</i>  or searching for e-mail addresses corresponding to specific persons, such as  residents in an area. Many spammers utilize programs called web spiders to find  e-mail addresses on web pages, although it is possible to fool the web spider by  substituting the &quot;@&quot; symbol with another symbol, for example &quot;#&quot;, while posting  an e-mail address.</p>
<p>Many e-mail spammers go to great lengths to conceal the origin of their  messages. They might do this by spoofing e-mail addresses (similar to Internet  protocol spoofing). In this technique, the spammer modifies the e-mail message  so it looks like it is coming from another e-mail address. However, many  spammers also make it easy for recipients to identify their messages as spam by  placing an ad phrase in the <i>From</i> field&mdash;very few people have names like  &quot;GetMyCigs&quot; or &quot;Giving away playstation3s&quot;!</p>
<p>Among the tricks used by spammers to try to circumvent the filters is to  intentionally misspell common spam filter trigger words. For example, &quot;viagra&quot;  might become &quot;vaigra&quot;, or other symbols may be inserted into the word as in  &quot;v/i/a/g./r/a&quot;. The human mind can handle a surprising degree of corruption, but  sometimes this tactic can backfire, rendering a message illegible. ISPs have  begun to use the misspellings themselves as a filtering test.</p>
<p>The most dedicated spammers&mdash;often those making a great deal of money or  engaged in illegal activities, such as the pornography, casinos and Nigerian  scammers&mdash;are often one step ahead of the ISPs. Reporting them to your ISP may  help block less sophisticated spammers in the future.</p>
<p>So-called &quot;spambots&quot; are a major producer of e-mail spam. The worst spammers  create e-mail viruses that will render an unprotected PC a &quot;zombie computer&quot;;  the zombie will inform a central unit of its existence, and the central unit  will command the &quot;zombie&quot; to send a low volume of spam. This allows spammers to  send high volumes of e-mail without being caught by their ISPs or being tracked  down by antispammers; a low volume of spam is instead sent from many locations  simultaneously. Many consumer-level ISPs (Earthlink, for example) stop spambots  by blocking the SMTP port (port 25), although there are some users who make  legitimate use of it.</p>
<h3>Messaging spam</h3>
<p>Messaging spam, sometimes termed <i>spim</i> (a portmanteau of spam and IM,  short for instant messenger), makes use of instant messaging systems, such as  AOL Instant Messenger or ICQ. Many IM systems offer a directory of users,  including demographic information such as age and sex. Advertisers can gather  this information, sign on to the system, and send unsolicited messages. To send  instant messages to millions of users on most IM services merely requires  scriptable software and the recipients' IM usernames. Spammers have similarly  targeted Internet Relay Chat channels, using IRC bots that join channels and  bombard them with advertising messages. Because most IM protocols are  proprietary, it is easier to enact unilateral changes to make spamming more  difficult.</p>
<p>A similar sort of spam can be sent with the Messenger Service in Microsoft  Windows. The Messenger Service is an SMB facility intended to allow servers to  send pop-up alerts to a Windows workstation. When Windows systems are connected  to the Internet with this service running and without an adequate firewall, it  can be used to send spam. The Messenger Service can, however, be easily  disabled. <a href="http://www.itc.virginia.edu/desktop/docs/messagepopup/" title="http://www.itc.virginia.edu/desktop/docs/messagepopup/" class="external autonumber"> [1]</a></p>
<p>Messenger service spam, in particular, has lent itself to spammer use in a  particularly circular scheme. In many cases, messenger spammers send messages to  vulnerable Windows machines consisting of text like <i>&quot;Annoyed by these  messages? Visit this site.&quot;</i> The link leads to a Web site where, for a fee,  users are told how to disable the Windows messenger service. Though the  messenger service is easily disabled for free by the user, this scam works  because it creates a perceived need and then offers an immediate solution.  Oftentimes, the only &quot;annoying messages&quot; the user is receiving through Messenger  are advertisements to disable Messenger itself.</p>
<h3>Newsgroup spam and Forum spam</h3>
<p>Newsgroup spam predates e-mail spam, and targets Usenet newsgroups. Old  Usenet convention defines spamming as excessive multiple posting, that is, the  repeated posting of a message (or substantially similar messages). Since posting  to newsgroups is nearly as easy as sending e-mails, newsgroups are a popular  target of spammers. The Breidbart Index was developed to provide an objective  measure of the &quot;spamminess&quot; of a multi-posted or cross-posted message on Usenet.</p>
<p>Spamming an internet forum in general, is when a user posts something which  is off-topic or doesn&rsquo;t have anything to do with the current subject. Also, a  post that doesn&rsquo;t contribute to the thread whatsoever is also considered spam in  some cases. A third form of Forum Spamming is where a person repeatedly posts  about a certain subject in a manner that is unwanted by (and possibly annoying  to) the general population of the forum. Lastly there is also the case where a  person posts messages solely for the purpose of increasing his or her ranking on  the forum. In a broader sense, advertising on forums where it is not wanted is  known as spamming and is generally seen as an annoyance.</p>
<h3>Mobile phone spam</h3>
<p>Mobile phone spam is directed at the text messaging service of a mobile  phone. This can be especially irritating to consumers not only for the  inconvenience but also because they sometimes have to pay to receive the text  message.</p>
<h3>Internet telephony spam</h3>
<p>It has been predicted that voice over IP (VoIP) communications will be  vulnerable to being spammed by prerecorded messages. Although there have been  few reported incidents, some companies have already tried to sell defenses  against it. <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3398331" title="http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3398331" class="external autonumber"> [2]</a></p>
<h3>Online game messaging spam</h3>
<p>Many online games allow players to contact each other via player-to-player  messaging, or chatrooms or public discussion areas.</p>
<p>What qualifies as spam varies from game to game, but usually this term is  applied to all forms of flooding the game with messages; in case of MUDs, the  problem is usually the same as with other chat services.</p>
<p>Many games have strict rules on what kind of communication is acceptable in  the games. Frequently, the terms of service don't allow promotion of external  websites except on very strict terms (for example, URLs may be allowed on player  profiles, but not anywhere else), and promotion of websites in-game is usually  very much frowned on in any case.</p>
<h3>Spam targeting search engines (Spamdexing)</h3>
<p><b>Spamdexing</b> (a portmanteau of <i>spamming</i> and <i>indexing</i>)  refers to the practice on the World Wide Web of deliberately modifying HTML  pages to increase the chance of them being placed high on search engine  relevancy lists. People who do this are called search engine spammers. In  layman's terms, spamdexing is using unethical means known as &quot;black hat seo  techniques&quot; to unfairly increase the rank of sites in search engines. When a  website is optimized to be indexable by a search engine, without trying to  deceive its web crawler, this is called search engine optimization. To be sure,  there is much gray area between <i>white-hat</i> search engine optimization and <i>black-hat</i> spamdexing.</p>
<h4>Blog, wiki, guestbook, and referrer spam</h4>
<p>Google's PageRank system uses the number of links to a page as an index of  its &quot;importance&quot;. Ordinarily, very few pages will link to a spammer's commercial  site, because it is of no interest to anyone else, and hence it will have a very  low PageRank score. To counter this effect, spammers attempt to create links to  their sites on other people's pages.</p>
<p>The most common targets for this kind of spam are weblogs, the spamming then  being known as blog spam, or &quot;blam&quot; for short. In 2003, this type of spam took  advantage of the open nature of comments in the blogging software Movable Type  by repeatedly placing comments to various blog posts that provided nothing more  than a link to the spammer's commercial web site. <a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.03/google.html?pg=7" title="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.03/google.html?pg=7" class="external autonumber"> [3]</a></p>
<p>Similar attacks are often performed against wikis and guestbooks, both of  which accept user contributions; something that consistantly impresses and  confounds critics of Wikipedia is its remarkable lack of spam, in spite of  having nearly one million articles and over two million pages.</p>
<p>On January 18, 2005, Google proposed a <code>rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;</code> attribute  that could be placed on a link; doing so instructs most major search engines to  ignore the link, rendering it useless to spammers. Software is then rewritten to  add this attribute to any link embedded in a comment. As of April 2005, nofollow  has seen expanding usage, but is not yet universal. <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html" title="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html" class="external autonumber"> [4]</a></p>
<p>As well as comment forms, editable pages and guestbooks, some sites publish a  list of the most common referrers to their site in order to show how readers  have found it. These lists have also been exploited by spammers with so-called  referer spam, in which the spammer makes repeated web site requests using a fake  referer URL pointing to a spam-advertised site. That URL will later appear as a  link on the site, boosting the PageRank of its target.</p>
<p>This guide is licensed under the <a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html">GNU Free Documentation License</a>.  It uses material from the <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a>.</p>

    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
